MICHAEL JACKSON

[takersbabe]

Fingerprints on porn magazines: Prosecution at fault?
Could Jackson Prosecution Evidence Be Compromised?
February 1, 2005

A "Celebrity Justice" Exclusive.

As Michael Jackson and potential jurors in his child molestation case arrived in Santa Maria, Tuesday, "CJ" uncovered details of a bombshell development that could bring into question key evidence against the embattled pop star, because the evidence may have been compromised.

When deputies raided Jackson's Neverland ranch in 2003, we're told they seized a stash of adult material, including one magazine that reportedly had the fingerprints of both Jackson and his accuser on the same page. Judge Rodney Melville has ruled this evidence is fair game in the trial. But there may be a big problem with the evidence, according to "CJ" Executive Producer and attorney Harvey Levin, who told us the "C" word may now take center stage: "contamination."

"Based on what we've seen, this evidence may have been compromised," Levin observed. "We know when this accuser testified before the grand jury he handled these magazines. At one point, one of the grand jurors asked, 'Have these magazines been fingerprinted?' And the sheriff said, 'No.' That leaves the door wide open for the defense to argue, 'How do you know when the boy touched the magazine? At Neverland? Or before the grand jury?'"

Meanwhile, it's the selection of the trial jury that's taking center stage right now. Jackson left court Tuesday after the judge ruled some 250 people interviewed will return Monday for more intense questioning.

Our reporter was in the courtroom Tuesday, as Jackson smiled at potential jurors and took notes, but how will he behave when testimony gets underway? NBC News Chief Legal Correspondent Dan Abrams tells us he doesn't think jurors will see Jackson acting up like he did during his 2002 civil trial in a business dispute, saying, "I expect that Tom Mesereau each and every day will be saying, 'Michael, you ready to go? You ready to behave? Ready to move forward?' I don't expect to see any antics."

And "CJ" has also learned Jackson has a secret hideaway in Santa Maria where he goes during lunch breaks -- a place he and his lawyer will be able to sit down and talk about the case.







This looks to be good news. Sneddon probably planned it, and hoped it would go un-noticed.
I'm not saying that's fact, but knowing Sneddon, it certainly seems possible. Anyways, ever since Monday, good news seems to keep popping up for MJ.

[takersbabe]

Originally Posted by ollie

thats ok then, with the security at the place would have thought it quite difficult to hide porn under his bed owt about get his fingerprints on it.

didnt quite make sense to me ollie what did you mean? :)

[Mattylad]

Originally Posted by ollie

know what id do if he came within 100 yards of mine!

Give them a pen & paper or a marker & a MJ record & get them to get autographs ?? :yelrotflm

[takersbabe]

lolol@ mattylad

[ollie]

what would i want my grandchildren to have his autograph for? Be better with a photograph, put them off plastic surgery when their older, might be worth a bob or two on e bay when he's locked up for life. How anyone in their right mind can think he's normal is beyond me, his kids are masked, dangled out of windows and bought off some sad cow in the first place.

[takersbabe]

he masked his kids to give them privacy from the damned press not to be weird? i can totally see why he does this after all this crap that happens. can i just ask aswel ollie what is your idea of "normal" is anyone "normal"?

[ollie]

if you dangled your child from a bedroom window I would not call that normal behaviour and would expect someone to do something about it, unfortunately
it appears if you have masses of money you can do want you want, and why agree to an interview to be shown world wide and then mask the kids so you cant see them? Could they be a strange colour? I feel more sorry for those kids of his than anyone else involved in this charade and that dear is my last word on this subject, we are just getting in a slanging match over something that will probably be resolved same as last time, a large payout to shut everyone up

[takersbabe]

i wasnt getting into a slanging match? it was just a conversation.

[Mattylad]

I quite look forward to a large payout to shut me up.

[takersbabe]

lol well i aint paying ya unless you pay me aswel?

[grannyclaret]

lets have a bet in the bookies ,all i can say is who has the best lawyers in america??,it doesent seam to matter if people are guilty or innocent,all they are interested in is the greenbacks not the ethics

[wayneyboy1942]

Originally Posted by takersbabe

i wasnt getting into a slanging match? it was just a conversation.

Thats what the threads all about,when I talk to people I do'nt mind if they do'nt agree with me and sometimes the other point of view is just as strong as mine! It's all about opinions and it would be boring if we all thought the same. :)